Observations and Diaries
- Author(s)
- Claudine Borg, Carmen Heine, Hanna Risku
- Abstract
Observation and introspection can be used as qualitative, cognitive ethnographic research methods. Qualitative field observation allows researchers to study translators, interpreters and other relevant actors in situ. Introspective diaries facilitate a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes of note takers. Both are rooted in ethnographic research principles, which is reflected in the data collection techniques, observational modes and ethical considerations described in this chapter. They support the understanding of activities in their social and material environments and histories. This chapter introduces these two research methods and examines ethical issues, conceptual aspects and implementations of observational and diary research. It discusses advantages and disadvantages of the two methods, considers their relevance for translation and interpreting studies research and provides practical recommendations for research projects.
- Organisation(s)
- Department for Translation Studies
- External organisation(s)
- University of Malta, Aarhus University
- Pages
- 108–132
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.10.05bor
- Publication date
- 2025
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 602051 Translation studies
- ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities(all)
- Portal url
- https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/384e1f34-6fe6-42af-8f0b-59d7a091a729